

In case of noisy images I found that the Frequency Domain Chroma algorithm produces slightly more pleasing appearance of the noise. Markesteijn 3pass is the best choice IMHO for general purpose and it comes with an opencl implementation. There are basically 3 algorithms for demosaicing you can choose from. I do see a bit more color noise but that can be remedied in Lightroom as a tiff file after darktable export.įirst of all, I don't think that there is any relevant difference between the processing of Xtrans III, II or I. There currently are unique cameras, unique samples.Does anyone have a basic work flow for using darktable and fuji x-trans III Raf files? I have been playing with darktable a bit these past few days and it seems as if the demosaic process offers a bit more detail than with that of Lightroom.

Please refer to this post for the up-to-date information. NOTE: this table does not list the availability of freely available sample at.


Noise Profile: If darktable has a noise profile so you can use the profiled denoise module with the cameraĬustom Matrix: If darktable has a user supplied custom matrix for the camera as a potential alternative in the color input module WB Presets: If darktable has white balance presets for the camera so you can choose things like “Daylight” and “Fluorescent” in the temperature module You don’t need to go through these steps yourself necessarily but instead attach enough sample files to the bug report so we can do it ourselves.Ĭamera: The name of the camera with at least basic support in darktable
